By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
FIT_Gamer said:


I gave you that already man! 

My theory is: men and dinos did not live together, I mean, they were not househod pets.

So, when the disaster came, the mud did not catch them close to each other.

However, there is footsteps of men steps inside dinos footprints around the world.

Fossiles, as you know, are really rare, not all animals were drowned in mud and covered for good. Most of them just drowned and the fish and decay took care of them.

So, do not expect to see a perfect representation of ancient life in fossil form.

However, see the ammazing soft tissue evidence, the Carbon-14 discrepancies!

It is all a lie man! Science have built a castle of cards, they can´t move a single piece without losing everything.

It is just to embarrassing to admit it.

I don't think you understand. It doesn't matter if human and dinosaurs were opposite sides of the earth.  If the "great flood" washed over the entire earth both human and dinosaur remains would be found in the same layers of earth. I'm not saying they would be found spooning each other.

You know, many fossilized trees were found STANDING crossing many geologic strata. Which means the Jurassic, Triassic, Mesozoic, Cenozoic thing is all bullcrap. It is just layers of rock, it does not mean that one is older than the other. At best, one eas heavier than the other and, AS THE WHOLE WORLD became a gigantic swimming pool, they setle down in the order of the weight.

Which could, could, explain why some animals are find in diferent layers.

However, and I tell you this cause I know you are a cool dude, do not understimate the evil agenda behinda all this: most of the evidence is hidden from us.



My grammar errors are justified by the fact that I am a brazilian living in Brazil. I am also very stupid.