Ubisoft is just being lazy with the PC version of AC Unity

[VanceIX]

Dr.Henry_Killinger said:

VanceIX said:

Scoobes said:
I put this in the other thread:

"I call overinflated bullshit.

Bethesda have done it with a few games already, as has EA with SoM, so why not Ubisoft? My guess is the minimum spec will play at 1080p, 60fps, Ultra graphics settings. Recommended will be for 4K or something equally ridiculous.

I'm starting to get suspicious that publishers are striking deals with hardware manufacturers to over inflate their minimum specs. Bring on the conspiracy theories!"

I stand by this. I think people with weaker systems will still be able to play at lower graphics settings. If not, it'll be modded until they can.

AC4 was barely playable on even better hardware. My 7970 occasionally chugged in jungle areas on ultra, which is just sad. I would not put it past Ubisoft to release such a shit port that it really can only run well on top of the line hardware.

So entitled. Why does Ubisoft have to spend so much effort getting the game to run the way you like it when chances are you are gonna pay for the game at a discounted rate. Its not like Ubisoft gets any money from your fancy specs. Run it in medium, it only hurt for a second.

It's not about being entitled. When a top-of-the-line graphics card cannot run a game without lag, there's a problem with optomization, not to mention all the bugs that existed in the PC version.

There is nothing wrong or entitled about calling a company out on shitty optomization. 

Not to mention, I paid $59.99 for Black Flag, thank you very much.