By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Captain_Tom on 23 October 2014
Edit Thread
HollyGamer said:
Captain_Tom said:
 

Hey, don't get me wrong - I completely agree that the grand majority of devs have been lazy with the extra performance.  Heck I will use ACU as an EXCELLENT example:

-Ubisoft says that the CPU's are not fast enough to handle 60 FPS with so many people on screen.  This is true if you only use the CPU for both of those things.  However large numbers of similar calculations are great for GPGPU. Hmmmmm, oh yeah Ubisofts hordes of stupid civilians would be perfect for GPGPU.  But they know that the X1's paltry GPGPU capabilities wouldn't make much of a difference, and so they were to lazy to take full advantage of the PS4 hardware.

-Yes Naughty Dog and Guerilla Games will come out and make ACU look practically last gen in comparison.  Don't kid yourself, third parties never want their games to look bad on even one platform and they will change there ways to catch up.  Just look at how ND and GG forced DICE to make BF3 take full advantage of the PS3.  It had higher res tectures, better lighting, more particle affects, and better AA than the 360 once they used the CELL's SPs effectivelly...And the PS3 was only 50% stronger than the 360 at best, so imagine what will happen now...

Yeah, you're right , :)

............they will obliterate their competitor on graphic department and on first time ever the most console sold with the more powerful spec and  i hope we will see great games in the future with great graphic, something that could only been dreamed of when it was happend during PS2 vs Xbox original era.

:)