This guy basically solved all the middle east problems. yet who's listening?

[o_O.Q]

DonFerrari said:

o_O.Q said:

have you realised that so far that is your only retort?

you seem to be more concerned with being offended that i may have shown you something you did not know than actually being appreciative that you gained the chance to learn something new

and that is where ego and lack of humility pay a part in keeping people ignorant

 

for example, you posted videos describing conflicts in the middle east which started in 1980 to demonstrate how i was wrong about united states influence

i then proceeded to show you how these conflicts were in fact influenced by the united states when zbigniew brezinzski funded the mujahideen

 

instead of simply admitting that you were mistaken you just dismissed it all as something you knew before hand

so you knew and yet you still posted that false bullshit about the conflicts without pointing out that they were caused by united states influence

 

so no it has nothing to do with intellect its just that you are too arrogant to allow yourself to see how you are wrong

truly amusing but whatever buddy carry on

Man please stop... you are basically going against your own preach...

Pullus being right or wrong already knew all the info you posted and disagree. Could you consider that he may know more than you or being open and humble only work for him but not you?

Quite possibily a separation from State/Church/Law System could help them some, othe thing would be for the ethinicies to form their own countries (like africa should, because in some countries they forced several rival tribes in the same space and now get atriction). But to believe all the shit we have know is because of USA or any western country is no sense. Well asking for country separation probably wouldn't work too much since no ethinicity would want to lose power and land.

well you clearly did not read our conversation

had he known about the influence the us had in the middle east going way back beyond the 1980s

he wouldn't have done something so ignorant as to imply that the conflicts there in the 1980s occured simply because they hated each other and not because they were influenced

i'd advise you to actually take the time and go back and read our conversation from the start because clearly you either didn't read it or didn't understand what you read