Burek said:
It is true. It is becoming a problem of journalism in general, because, just as NBA and MLB expansions dilluted the talent on teams, the unprecedented expansion of journalism from a few newspapers, magazines and networks into a Milky Way of internet portals and youtube channels has brought into spotlight thousands of usually complete functional illiterates which present themselves as "journalists". A decade ago, we had 5 gaming magazines, and you could have taken their review to the bank 99 out of 100 times. Today, we have about 80 reviews tallied by Metacritic, along with dozens of video reviews, twitch reviews etc... You just cannot trust any single one. I don't read or watch reviews for over 2 years. I decided for myself after a period of information gathering. And so far I have made almost no mistakes when choising games to play, and know that I would have missed some very enjoyable games had I listened to reviews. |
This is the understanding, I think, the millenials and the newer generation of gamer's needs to come to. I prefer watching dev diaries, and unfiltered gameplay videos over any reviews these days. Part of that is also that I don't feel there's really any reviewer out there with my specific tastes. Now, I'm not slamming the younger generation, because quite frankly, I too trusted reviewers far more when I was younger. But, as I got older and it was easier for me to pick out shady behavior (or it's simply become more widely reported on), my views about reviews in general have changed, dramatically. I think one of the worst facets of gaming over the past 10+ years, is the reliance and trust, that metacritic illicits from people.







