S.T.A.G.E. said:
Yeah....most of the games which made the launch for MS was either made by third party or not even owned by MS. It will continue to be that way throughout the gen. |
Why. Please explain.
Phil hasn't lied yet and has been totally honest even about areas that need improving. If he sys he is different.ofrm.previous people in the position then he.is. he's already told rare to work on non Kinect games. He made Xbox one available without Kinect and he's looking like dropping the parity clause for same day releases. He's also going to rare next month to see their non Kinect projects.
They own Alan wake and own quantum break. There is also nothing wrong with having an outside team work on an ip Microsoft ow. If its a good game what's the difference? Its actually good rothe industry as other devs get o have great support for a game they are making even if its owned by Microsoft.
Let's see what Phil announces from now till e3. We hve athe Xbox event in February next year. Phils been awesome so far, so putting him in the asme bracket as don mattrick is just silly.
We will see banjo 3 this gen. Also conker to. He's bringing phantom dust back owned by Microsoft which he already announced. And they built a brand new studio to look after gears.