| Dr.Henry_Killinger said: [...] Well here's the thing, Rol. My side of the argument is that I am not convinced of either claim not that (Sony has not abandoned the Vita) . I don't need evidence to support a neutral standpoint. Notice how the thread title is not making a declarative statement but instead asking for the explanation of the following claim. Instead of saying "I don't believe" I say, "I don't understand". The lack of proof is why I can't reach a conclusion, I'm not asserting one. EDIT: It's simple really, since we are assuming support = software support If the amount of games increase per year of the Vita then its getting more support, if the amount of games decreases per year of the Vita then its getting less support, ignore third party games if limiting it to 1st party support, set an arbitrary Metascore if limiting to games with X meta or above (since its the closest metric to a game's quality you will get) |
I can't really tell whether Sony is supporting or abandoning Vita, but sales tell us that if it's still supporting it, it isn't doing it properly or enough.
It can be wrong strategies and timing or lack of resources, or a mix of these things, or it could even be deliberate (for reasons we ignore, but if could be for lack of resources and impossibility of supporting it too during the first efforts to launch PS4 and supporting its leadership in the longer term).
