Mummelmann said:
What exactly did you think that means? My point is that; A: Nintendo have made practically no effort to compromise with developers outside their in-house relations. B: If they do not do that, the responsibility for providing breadth in software falls more on themselves. C: They have failed to live up to that responsibility and have also been bogged down by extended development cycles and delays. Again; "other developers" implies developers besides Nintendo, agreed? I don't understand how there can be any major misconception there. Besides; Nintendo's relations with 3rd parties is among the most relevant bits of the topic and underlines the importance of building new IP's themselves. |
Sorry, I misread the comment lmfao. I am dyslexic. Then we are in an agreement then.