By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Mummelmann said:

At no point did you mention 3rd party relations in your original comment. The topic at hand is , which you expressed in your original comment, is extending nintendo's Ip base


"they are well known for not tasking risks on behalf of their audience or other developers who could provide more variety in their software library."

What exactly did you think that means? My point is that;

A: Nintendo have made practically no effort to compromise with developers outside their in-house relations.

B: If they do not do that, the responsibility for providing breadth in software falls more on themselves.

C: They have failed to live up to that responsibility and have also been bogged down by extended development cycles and delays.

Again; "other developers" implies developers besides Nintendo, agreed? I don't understand how there can be any major misconception there. Besides; Nintendo's relations with 3rd parties is among the most relevant bits of the topic and underlines the importance of building new IP's themselves.

Sorry, I misread the comment lmfao. I am dyslexic.  Then we are in an agreement then.