Mnementh said:
No, that wasn't what I said, and you can read it right well in what I really said. I said most people knew clear and well that HW wasn't the next Zelda, so what I said was basically that people were buying it despite it's just a Warriors game. Yes, that's what I said. I know that the Zelda skins are inciting more interest in the west, that was the reason they did that. Still everyone knows it isn't a new Zelda. So why are you trying so hard to imply that people were fooled into buying Hyrule Warriors? Interesting you throw in Links Crossbow Training *NOW*. Because that is a much better comparison, as a Zelda spinoff. Still, Crossbow Training wouldn't have sold that much without bundling with the Zapper. Still, much better comparison. But you never mentioned it before. Also 'Freshly-Picked: Tingle's Rosy Rupeeland' is a Zelda-spinoff that works as a comparison for Hyrule Warriors. But before this post, you were always implying we should compare Hyrule Warriors with Mainline Zeldas, that is basically the same as comparing Theatrythm:FF with mainline Final Fantasy. |
Perhaps you do not understand the difference between imply and infer? All I've ever said is other Zelda games--which includes spin-offs--and I never once said people were "fooled".
This entire thing has turned ridiculous. If you want to battle over something as meaningless as thing, then go find someone else. I'm sure it won't be hard. It's getting impossible to even have a discussion without people acting as if their family honor has been insulted.
