| tbone51 said: First off, my bad with the misunderstanding with the numbers, i meant it as a 6mil difference, but its not a big deal :P Now for the main topic, Yes it all makes sense. You bring up a good argument that i do mostly agree with. Only thing is Pokemon aint everything and thats all im trying to say here. Vita is a different situation as the psp success was mostly due to third parties, even before MH came out for it. Nintendo fully supported their HH, and even without pokemon, they can still manage to pull great numbers. Just to be clear, though i guess i see it differently with you and other users here, i do understand and agred with practically everything you guys are saying, only thing i personally dont agree with is that pokemon makes up the entire momentum of Nintendo HHs, with the execption of the GBC |
Oh, absolutely. I don't disagree with you at all. No matter what, they have great selling franchises that can help their handhelds reach respectable numbers (for all I know it could still sell over 50m without pokemon). I was just saying that it's hard to tell just how much each franchise helps.
Anyway. I'm glad we agree :)
