| Onyxmeth said: For those arguing that the Gamecube was better because it recieved a majority of the Dreamcast's best games after the DC had left the market, ask yourself this; is the Wii a better console than the NES, SNES, N64, Turbo Grafix-16, Sega Master System, Sega Genesis and Neo Geo because the Virtual Console contains a good majority of the quality library each system posessed after each console had left the market? The scenario is the same. Had the Sega Dreamcast not gone off the market, GC would have never recieved those games and had the entire VC console competitors not have gone off the market, the VC wouldn't have recieved those games. You should be taking each library as it's own at the time it was released, minus those strange instances where libraries intersect, because for all accounts it's really not a fair argument. |
This arguement doesnt make a lot of sense. We are looking back at the entire life span of both systems so why wouldnt the entire systems libraby be taken into account. Thats like excluding RE:4 from the PS2 or Lost Planet from the PS3s game librabies because they were released first on another system. Why exclude great games regardless of how they got there? I consider Ikaruga to be one of the best Gamecube titles even though it started as a Dreamcast exclusive. And yes i believe that all of the virtual console titles should be included in the Wiis library of avialable games too. Should we exclude Xbox 360 arcade games from its appeal? I agree that the Dreamcast had a vastly superior library at launch and if it didnt die prematurely it could have easily surpassed the Gamecube but the fact is that it didnt.
