Munkeh111 said:
I must say I loved the decayed beauty look, but graphics are always going to age But I think the gameplay still holds up fairly well. I maintain that no other game has done a cover system as well as Gears 1 (let alone 3!) and I love active reloading. The sink hole dynamic is also quite interesting, encouraging positive play to blow it up before too many can come through It's also got a pretty good variety of weapons. Obviously the lancer was fantastic, but I love the feeling of the longshot more than any other gun I can think of. The Torque Bow also adds a bit of extra variety in there. Then of course the enemies. This is an area where I felt they improved each game, with greater variety coming in Personally, I feel 2 was the best, but I still maintain 1 is a classic |
I mean its not just the graphics. It's the terrible dialogue, the bad voice overs, and the (Now) cliche combat scenarios. These aspects of games have made BIG strides from the time of G1's release and they show.
I am not saying Gears isn't a classic, because objectively speaking it is. However that doesn't mean the things that make it a classic are special in a new game.
I guess my point is this: A new Gears game can be good, but it can't just be a prettier version with new features anymore (The last Gears proved this). If it is good, it will be because it got a MASSIVE overhaul to the point that is nearly a different game. Think of the difference between Metal Gear Solid games. The general themes are the same, but the gameplay mechanics are completily different. That's what the next Gears needs.







