By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
mornelithe said:
Landguy said:
Puppyroach said:
Btw, how do you even prove that a parity clause does NOT exist? Isn´t that the classical "you cannot prove a negative", like "prove there is no god" or "prove the tooth fairy isn´t real"?


I don't think that you have to prove that there is a parity clause.  I think think that you have to prove that the game is not CPU bound as Ubisoft claims.  In this and almost every thread, I have seen people make the claim of "that's not true" or whatever.  I am just saying, if you want everyone to flat out believe that there is a parity clause, show me some technical documents or some actual industry big wigs that would say this is a lie.  Give me a few links, give me something other than "because I say so".  So far, all we have to go by is that the developer says that is how it is.  No proof otherwise. 

Like I said in an earlier post, I have looked in countless places throughout the net and many different threads on many websites.  I have yet to see anyone prove anything or even give a compelling argument with a small amount of proof to support that Ubisoft is lying.  With that said, like many others, I still think that hey are lying somehow.  Know this, I will buy the game and enjoy it for what it is.

I would imagine once the PC version ships, they actually should be able to get benchmarks on CPU usage.

The funnier thing will be that the minimum system requirements for the PC game will be much lower than that of the PS4/XB1.  Even with that lower system specs, it will probably somehow run better than the console versions...  But, I agree, we will eventually find out something.



It is near the end of the end....