curl-6 said:
kristianity77 said:
curl-6 said:
To be fair, PS4/Xbone are not as high end for their time as PS3/360 were. Not that that's a bad thing; nobody wanted "$599 US dollars" all over again.
|
Yes but they dont really need to be. When you consider "high end" this time around on a PC then you are factoring in resolutions thats the Xbox and PS4 dont even need to worry about such as 1440p and above. High end on a PC these days is taking gaming above 1080p rather than on it or under. PC gaming in the main is done on a monitor where by the minimum is probably 1080p these days and more often than not now go above and beyond that. Console gaming is still I would guess done 99.9% of the time on a 720p tv or a 1080p TV and not a 4K screen which is the next logical step up.
At the end of the day, if a console, no matter what generation it is, can outperform a PC in a similar price bracket, then it is achieving what is has set out to do. And you cannot replicate PS4 graphics, 1080p or 900p or whatever, on a PC which costs the same as a console.
|
Like I said, it's not a bad thing that PS4/Xbone/Wii U aren't cutting edge. It saves us having to pay an exorbitant price.
Honestly, Wii U graphics are satisfactory to me, so 1440p and such isn't even on my radar.
|
Exactly. And the thing is, 1440p or whatever, isn't on the vast majority of console gamer radars either because they don't have the TVs to run it, and dont want to fork out the money to do so. If a game looks good on a standard HD telly, then thats more than good enough. And people saying that the latest generation games dont look good enough either have something wrong in the head, or a PC gamers just giving it the old master race rubbish which is...by itself...quite sad.
