vivster said:
generic-user-1 said:
vivster said:
Don't think this has anything to do with NVidia. If anything with Intel :P
I believe the devs when they are saying that the game is very CPU heavy. All previous AC games were too. But this time they overdid it.
I'm pretty sure if they reduced the number of people in the world there would be no parity since the CPU resources would be free to feed the GPUs and there would be a natural gap between the graphics again.
|
the CPU cant be the problem, it will run on an allmost 8 years old intel without problem. its not that demanding if u compare it with other PC games that realy need the cpu power.
and it has nvidia exclusiv graphic features and ubi is working close with nvidia.
and ubi knows that they can get away with poor amd performance, because they dont care if u buy it on xbox or ps(it might benefits em if they sale the game on xbox, could be hat m$ is taking a smaller share of the price than sony)
they will bundle it with nvidia cards like the last one and sale a shitloa of copys to nvidia for that promotion deal...
http://www.gamezone.com/news/ubisoft-nvidia-announce-pc-partnership-for-assassin-s-creed-unity-far-cry-4-the-division-the-crew
|
The console wars doesn't have anything to do with Nvidia. Nobody thinks "OH WOW AMD!" when they pick up their console. It's pretty much a closed market and Nvidia has no game in it. It wouldn't benefit them in the least if some console game runs worse than a PC game with Nvidia because all games on PC run better than consoles no matter the brand of card.
And where are you taking that bolded from? I wouldn't be surprised if I run into a CPU bottleneck on PC with my 3570k. I mean look at the trailers. There is a shitload for the CPU to do. I'm talking RTS proportions.
|
a friend has a very special pc, with a big modern gpu and an old q6600 intel cpu, and the cpu was never a problem.
and every pc goes down on its knees if u playing the wrong rts(yes im looking a u load of shit rome 2 with your stupid AI)
Essay Pro