By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
generic-user-1 said:
vivster said:
Avro1958 said:

JUst looking at some benchmarks, I can't link right now but google is your friend :-p shows the PS4 ahead of the XB1, again Dev's that actually work with the hardware also have been saying this aswell.

Please link. That would be new to me that the PS4 CPU is somehow superior to the X1's. Haven't seen any dev praising any of the CPUs either. That's probably because they're both shit.


they are amd cpus after all.

and the PC matters this time, seems like the game will be optimist for Nvidia, they talk about nvidia exclusiv graphic features.

that could mean the parity is because the doesnt want to optimise it for amd(consoles run all on amd) because they want the payments from nvidia? that would explain the 900p/30fps.  (the last asscreed look a lot better on

"cheap" nvidia cards than on console or amd cards, anc it run a lot better)

Don't think this has anything to do with NVidia. If anything with Intel :P

I believe the devs when they are saying that the game is very CPU heavy. All previous AC games were too. But this time they overdid it.

I'm pretty sure if they reduced the number of people in the world there would be no parity since the CPU resources would be free to feed the GPUs and there would be a natural gap between the graphics again.



If you demand respect or gratitude for your volunteer work, you're doing volunteering wrong.