By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

1 - Violence in self defence, yes. The Surah is clear about that. Why do you ignore that ?

2 - True, That's why having knowledge about the circumstances surrounding the event is important, feel free to check the validity of what I tell you.

3- You keep ignoring the true meaning and taking things out of context , It is a war agains muslims, the Surah says kill who tries to kill you and don't take prisoners, they will just fight you again.

4- Banu Qurayza betrayed the alliance with muslims and conspired agaist theIslam. Only warriors were killed. Here is a small text from Bukhari book.

"The Prophet said, "O Sad! These people have agreed to accept your verdict." Sad said, "I judge that their warriors should be killed and their children and women should be taken as captives." The Prophet said, "You have given a judgment similar to Allah's Judgment (or the King's judgment)."Sahih al-Bukhari,"

Again, Please read about the Islamic history, don't just read to people who criticize it.

Even if I concede to every one of your points it still clearly shows that Islam is a religion of violence and not peace.

Yes those were the times and given that Muhammed was just a normal con artist or deluded moron he behaved like a normal person in those times who did not receive instruction from a god like being.

Babbling words based on your agenda won't make what you're saying true. You clearly have nothing to say that can be discussed... An empty vessel. Happy dodging the rest.