Arkaign said:
NobleTeam360 said:
GribbleGrunger said:
I bet those differences would have mattered if they favoured your console of choice ... no? Higher resolution, better shadows (less blocky and less flickering) and more foliage isn't just a minor difference.
|
Didn't care last gen don't care this gen 
|
Wouldn't you play multiplats on 360 though? They are almost always better even to today (Destiny for example). I can understand if you don't own both, but that was my reason for owning a 360. I thought the exclusives sucked on 360, but otherwise it was a superb console (ignoring rrod). I loved the OG Xbox exclusives and the system. X1 I feel is their worst effort compared to the competition, but I'm willing to give Phil Spencer the benefit of the doubt and blame Mattrick for the issues I have with it. Phil took over less than a year ago, and it will take time to see the results of his new plans. I expect a great showing at e3 2015, as we should see the fruits of his new directives. He can't fix the console design, but he can still be a general that leads it to a better state for Xbox fans and gamers at large. I
I think going back to having tons of AA exclusives like the OG days is far better than a handful of tired IPs run into the ground as AAA budget muck. I'd be okay never seeing another Halo, Gears, or Fable ever again.
|
Actually no, there were lots of other factors last gen.
- Free online on ps3
- Uncompressed audio on ps3 (at least after mixing, no extra lossy dolby digital 5.1 in the output stream)
- No black crush on ps3
- No noisy dvd drive on ps3 (fixed with full game installs, but was still a nuisance on the 20gb model)
This gen everything is equal or in favor of the ps4, well apart from that online is not free anymore, yet still $10 cheaper a year.
