| Legend11 said: Wow those words would have had more punch to them if he had he not used the words "may have". But I guess this is coming from Sony's VP of marketing so it must be true. We should believe their claims though because like their claim of not paying for exclusives, it has to be true. I mean doesn't it make sense to you that a FPS like Haze had it's PC and 360 versions cut late in development and the PS3 version kept? Especially at a time when the PS3 was getting hammered in sales by the 360? I mean if it was your money on the line and Sony wasn't paying for the exclusive in some way wouldn't you agree to such a decision? |
I have to report late to the game but I just figured out what the each of Microsoft and Sony are doing. I thought this gen of PS3 FPS was kind of getting heavy on the PS3 but I thought it was all the 3rd party developer doing it. But as Legend pointed out, Sony has been going out of its way to put games like Haze, UT3, and Killzone on their console. So much so, that they have neglected their RPG front, which Microsoft has been targeting in the last year or so. Will I have have to pick up a X360 sooner than Christmas to get some decent RPGs and avoid all the bang bang shooters that I am really starting to dread.
And they are not paying for exclusives, they are simply helping them with marketing budget. 
You know, the way Microsoft has been with other companies. They all been doing it since Nintendo "got" the rights to Street Fighter II on its system and Sega had to wait a year or two. Business as usual.
I'm just saying...
