ethomaz on 29 September 2014
|
walsufnir said: While this is true esram should still be better performance wise as it should have a way lower latency. But it really is way too small. |
It is true... ESRAM have way better latency (it is on die at all) but latency don't beneficiates graphics processing... it can beneficiate post-processing AA for example but GPU tasks are not affected by high or low latency.
ESRAM performance is fine... the issue is the size... 32MB is really small but I undestand MS because more could be costed A LOT.
