curl-6 said:
Intrinsic said:
OMG this crap again. One would think that when talking about a games graphics you can see processors, storage type and memory ON THE IMAGE.
How a game looks visually is just that, how it looks visually and nothing more. Wind Waker HD is one of the prettiest games I have seen and it runs on the WiiU. Its not about it being open world, modded to hell and back or whatever. Its about the image you are seeing on the screen which consists of the artstyle and presentation of the game in question. Its not about how much better whatever you are looking at could have run on much better hardware.
And as far as this thread is concerned, for now...DC is the most photorealistic looking game out there. These fabled things that they are always running on PCs. Show me something that is running on a PC... no better yet show me a GIF not some rezzed up 8k screen grab that could never actually run in game. Show me a GIF of this pack leading graphical photorealistic game on a PC and I will show you a GIF of DC that looks better.
Looks better, what we can see... not some immeasurable metric that only looks good on paper.
|
Hey, i'm the first guy to argue art style over tech, I reckon Muramasa and Kirby's Epic Yarn on Wii are still two of the best looking games I've ever seen.
But I've seen mods of Crysis running, and DC isn't as photorealistic.

|


You were saying? I mean lets be honest here.....