theprof00 on 26 September 2014
Your wondering at whether cone has a name is proof enough that you agree. I may not know all the terminology, but I know when it doesn't make sense to make certain decisions which you made. It was a good guess that I had a name, but not supported factually with the evidence that was available at the time. Whether cone has a name or not is meaningless. You made a decision based on the facts available that was not supported by the evidence.
Here you're doing the same thing trust in in padib to find the nuker over your own goddamn analysis, because you're not keen on fucking reading the game.
@padib
imp is referring to your post earlier that implied you had new information.
