GribbleGrunger on 25 September 2014
| czecherychestnut said: Aside from the boring, near non-sensical argument, I can't get my head around the title. 'Smoke and mirrors' implies that the sales lead isn't real, that Sony have done some dishonest tricks to pump up the appearance of sales. But the sales are real, the lead is real, the question in the article is 'is it deserved?' but that doesn't match the title at all. Which makes me think that the original author is either 1) very young or 2) not well educated, because they clearly don't understand what the phrase 'smoke and mirrors' actually means. |
Or 3) wrote a boring article and needed hits.
The PS5 Exists.
