NiKKoM said:
As ceo of sony 25 AAA games cause we are doing shit in all other stuff we try.. As MS ceo: minecraft cause in the end it will make waay more money then 25 AAA games bolstering our entire company and other services we provide.. As a gamer 2.5 billion in B games.. i actually think a lot of AAA games have been dissappointing the last few years.. Sure for those 2.5B can give you a lot of new gears, killzone, cods, gt, forza, AC, battlefield games but do i really want that? Nope i want a Vanquish, Binary Domain, Metal Gear Rising, Nier, Folklore.. More of that less AAA |
It makes sense... but them could be 100 niche games or varied budget (as gamer)... but it makes sense as MS to invest 2.5B in something to unify their plats instead of just games (even more when they could do both at the same time =p)
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."
