elazz said:
That is actually it why I'm not getting. Killzone 2 had a very dedicated fanbase and a lot of people enjoyed it because it didn't play like the other games. If I want to play something like CoD, well, there are a lot of games in that franchise that can give you the experience, no need for another franchise to try and do the same. |
and i was part of that Killzone 2 fanbase and i supported Killzone (unlike the people that you assume wanted Killzone to change but never bought it when it changed).
Also i like Killzone story and setting more than COD or BF, and i really liked the heavy feel that your character had in KZ (althoug some people complained that it make them dizzy, i was OK with it and i liked it), and i never wanted anything in Killzone to change, the only thing that i wanted was the OPTION to change to a much easier or comfortable control scheme, wich KZ 3 did and i think that in KZ 3 you could change the control scheme to classic KZ or to the more generic but more comfortable FPS scheme.
i never wanted or asked for a more generic and colorful KZ like shadowfall i simply wanted the option to change the control scheme so DONT blame my for KZ going out of its original path, because i bought and supported every Killzone on the PS3, and i didnt bought Shadowfall because just like you said it doesnt seems like Killzone anymore plus it didnt live to expectations.
EDIT: And i never asked for any actual changes to the franchise, heck i NEVER even asked them to change the control shceme yet they did it because i guess some other people wanted the same option that i wanted for a more comfortable control scheme








