By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Teeqoz said:
kowenicki said:
Teeqoz said:

It's just as relevant as what you and that other user has been discussing. You and that other user were debating this, and I decided to join in. Got a problem with that.


so your view on an asset is to be used to overirde an offical and legal transaction that will appear on official financial releases andearnings statements?

ok then. if you say so.


What does that have to do with the relevance of my post?

What does your lecture about financial transactions have to do with a joke saying that a  2 BN dollars loss is at least better than buying Mojang for 2,5 BN dollars. Dude, cheer up, you don't actually HAVE to take a joke regarding financials as a serious financial statement on what's the better deal -_-

And by what will appear on financial releases and earnings, what if I buy, say Nintendo (first example that fell into my head) for 1 trillion dollars. Does that suddenly make Nintendo worth 1 trillion dollars? No, obviously it doesn't.


And let's say when you put 1T to buy Nintendo, the shareholders, owners or what kind of control the company have, pick that money and leave... so you effectvelly tossed 1T at it, because that money won't stay in company to be used for investiments, etc...

But as he said MS makes 24B quarterly so they can toss as much as they want and we can't talk about it, we must limit ourselves to say sony is doomed because it still bleeding money.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."