By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
DonFerrari on 17 September 2014
Edit Thread
VXIII said:
DonFerrari said:
VXIII said:

Still better than Microsoft deal

At least it is 500M cheaper... and while MS blow the 2,5B in a game company and the 2B loss of Sony isn't related to game... on the gaming balance sheet Sony had a better deal =]... and I'm just joking as you were.

But... I wasn't joking, I only use "" so I wouldn't get banned.

 

x2


Ok then... let's celebrate that Sony spent 500M less than MS for basically the same effect in their gaming division.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."