By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Aerys said:
Imaginedvl said:
Aerys said:

You didnt understand the OP, if you had, you would understand he was talking about gamers point of view and not corporate pov so we dont care about the brand value for them.

lol yah right... The OP is talking about Gamers point of view specificaly on a sales website. Okay, I guess I missed that specific sentence :)

Look, you may want or believe that we should be talking about a gamer point of view but in now way the OP is asking about a gamer point of view, esp while posting dev. cost... It may be the case and it may be more conveniant to you tho.

You were talking about being childish but you are the best example of childish post in this topic.

It is obvious OP is talking about gamers pov, didnt you read the poll ? And if you have a doubt about that, just ask him, he will tell you the same thing, i wonder how you will spin that after his answer


Leave the polite, level headed and mature guy with his opinion of the OP said a thing he didn't and he trying to spin it not to agree... don't think we would make anything from insisting.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."