GTAexpert said:
Sorry what you think is essential and what I think is essential in a hack n slash are vastly different. GOW doesn't have as "fast-paced" combat as Bayonetta or MGR: R, but I still prefer its combat. If being fast-paced is everything, COD would be considered the best FPS series of all time. But that isn't the case. Heck you could say Dynasty Warriors has more fast-paced combat, but does that make it better? Lol no. And when did I say about GOW's combat not being fluid? It very much is, any GOW fan can tell you that, as combos can be easily chained to an extent, but not endlessly, as that would have made it too easy. I'm saying this again, that combat isn't everything in a hack and slash. And while that is subjective, you can't ignore all the other aspects of GOW that are in some cases far superior to Bayonetta. In fact, Bayonetta doesn't best GOW III in any single way. |
Yeah, no.
GOW is a garbage spam fest in comparison to Bayonetta 2. Bayo2 looks better, plays smother, deeper combat, better combat mechanics. You're not square square triangle-ing your way through most encounters in Bayonetta 2 without the game mocking you.
Subjectively: GOW story in no longer very good. I'd much rather play through a game like Bayo 2 that has a different story and doesn't take itself overly serious like comercials for GOW. Bayonetta is a better character than a douche with chains. Enemy design in Bayonetta is also more original.
