| HylianSwordsman said:
I'm for Sparks, he was one of my suspects. I didn't like his response to Nickles, which seemed to focus more on causing a reaction than actually laying out what was wrong with Nickles' argument. Too much "Really? Are you fucking kidding me? What even is this?" kind of bullshit empty statements, and not enough "this makes no sense because X and Y, this seems scummy because X and Y," kind of statements. He also told prof here that this is "just a day one vote" and how prof convinced him that they were a good idea, even saying he's "not going to vote no lynch" then proceeded to ask if anyone besides radish wanted to do a no lynch. This seems scummy to me. One minute you're saying it's a good idea to push for a day one lynch, then the next you're encouraging a no lynch? Not to mention, Sparks attitude towards day one lynches rubs me the wrong way. It's "just day one" eh? It comes off to me as saying that it's okay to vote on iffy logic because it's just day one. Sure Sparks, let's just go around lynching whoever happens to have a lynch train forming because there's "no one better to vote for". Okay. |
All the really's are because his argument are so absurd that that's the only reaction I could come up with. He says quoting Starcraft is evidence, and "causing confusion"? Not even close. He says quoting the leader of the bad guys is also proof. Are you kidding me? Also, him haveing a smart phone is proof. Him speculating on multiple factions, even though it apperently fully fits the flavor, AND impertinence said it first anyway.
Honestly, I'm not sure if you're being serious right now.
And yeah, it's a Day1 vote, I admit. Though, it is also for the person who we currently have the most clues and BS on.
*Catching up.
