Get ready, it's a big post but I'll to be as concise as possible. I'll be going through the early Day events as I saw them, my comments are in bold italic.
- Nickels comments on Carl's quote [http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=6653655]
- Carl responds with more quotes [http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=6653737]
- Nickels votes for Carl [http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=6655782]
| Nicklesbe said: This better be good. I wake up to find were going to die in a few days. We better get to it then. I'm going to take the advice of WoW and use our most powerful ability. That being the vote. I know it was before day one officially started and he was probably joking but based on recent experiance I've come to trust Theprofs initial instincts. So lets do this by the numbers and get the ball rolling. Vote: Carl2291 |
The way I read it was that he didn't mean much by this vote since he mentions the possibility of prof joking and says that it's to "get the ball rolling"
- Nickels goes into more detail about his vote still maintains that prof could have been joking but that he trusts his instinct [http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=6655822] [http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=6655844]
At this point, I'm still thinking Nickels is making an early vote to fish out a react (mainly because his reasoning is so very weak)
- Carl reacts to the vote by implying prof and Nickles are scum together starting a bandwagon [http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=6655901]
Again, I see this as early Day banter i.e. I don't think Carl really believed his own accusation
- Carl explains his reasoning behind his quotes [http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=6655945]
- Nickels seems satisfied with the response asks why Carl thinks prof is scum [http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=6656000]
- Carl says he didn't believe prof to be scum, was looking for a reaction [http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=6656041]
Seems my assumption was right
- Carl confronts Nickels about being the second vote on him when Nickels votes for bugrimmar [http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=6657974]
- Nickels says theprof's vote didn't count and reiterates his reasons for his vote on Carl [http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=6658021]
- Carl points back to the very first vote where the reasoning was simply "following prof and get the ball rolling" [http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=6658094]
That's the start of what will later be the main confrontation point between the two
Then there's the whole "I'm a liability to the Town" drama and later.
- Carl mistakes a post about EricFabian to be about him, Nickels corrects him, Carl explain why he thought it was address to him [http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=6663827] [http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=6663839] [http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=6663906]
I'll say that when I read the impertinence's post I understood what he meant (Will you be following theprof's vote this time too?) but I can also see why Carl would think Nickels's comment was aimed at him since that quoted post includes the vote for Carl.
Then there's a back and forth about Day talk where Nickels accuses Carl of slipping about Day talk and another argument over Carl rewriting history.
For the Day Talk slip, I didn't see it as such. Carl's post said that his behavior looked like he was told by his teammates to use a "feel sorry for me" tactic. What I think is by that point Nickels was so convinced Carl is Mafia that he's latching on to anything (or if Nickels is Mafia himself, he is trying his best to make Carl the target of a lynch should he avoid getting lynched).
The rewriting history argument seems to be rooted in Carl focusing solely on the first post where Nickels voted for him and on the other side Nickels considering the 2-3 posts he made about the vote as his original reasoning. All I see here is a pointless argument, between two players who have come to completely distrust each other.
Signature goes here!
