| Nicklesbe said: What makes you think this vote is serious as well? Without reasoning or analysis who can say why he voted for you? It could be a pressure vote, it could be a ploy to see who bandwagons against you or to see who defends you. Until he says I'd rather not assume the intention. As I said I trust his initial instincts, but more so when it comes to the questions he asks. Last game his votes betrayed him more often than not, but really shined was his analysis, the questions he asked, how he examined everything and gave great reasoning for everything. Even when he was wrong, but especially when he was right. So far that has been completely absent which makes me worry that maybe he is not town, so perhaps I should question everything he does even more so. Granted I know he is busy in Japan so I will give him some leeway with that and hope that it changes in time. |
The reason why I think the vote is a 'real' vote is because it follows a post where he claimed to have found two mafia slips. It makes sese that he is trying to dig into these two players whomever they might be.
No matter the reasoning (preasurre vote, serious scum read, deflecting from something, whatever) it's still a vote designed to do something. I see the two other votes as just fluff and joke votes. I don't know profs reasoning for voting me, no one does, but I see it as his first attempt to at least drive something.
