impertinence said:
indeed it would make sense for you to follow his vote on me. His first vote was an obvious joke vote, the second vote not a serious vote either, just a 'TruckOSaurus is always scum so I vote him' vote, his vote on me is the first vote he has made that can be said to have at least some relation to the game (assuming here that he thinks something I said was one of the two mafia slips he thinks he's seen). The vote is followed by no explanation, no reasoning, not anything really. Doesn't get much more than an intuition vote than that? |
What makes you think this vote is serious as well? Without reasoning or analysis who can say why he voted for you? It could be a pressure vote, it could be a ploy to see who bandwagons against you or to see who defends you. Until he says I'd rather not assume the intention. As I said I trust his initial instincts, but more so when it comes to the questions he asks. Last game his votes betrayed him more often than not, but really shined was his analysis, the questions he asked, how he examined everything and gave great reasoning for everything. Even when he was wrong, but especially when he was right. So far that has been completely absent which makes me worry that maybe he is not town, so perhaps I should question everything he does even more so. Granted I know he is busy in Japan so I will give him some leeway with that and hope that it changes in time.
http://www.youtube.com/v/AoOOpLpcF28 http://www.youtube.com/v/CphFZGH5030
All Hail the Jester King. The King is back, and I am still a dirty girl prof ;)