By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
CGI-Quality said:
starcraft said:

I did read the link, and had read it before. It does not say what you want it to say.

What we do have is similarities in the rapid post-show removal of marketing materials from a rival's website. As you agreed previously, clearly a deal of some sort has been made in both cases. All that will vary is the degree of incentive involved. The amounts differ, the principles are identical. As many point out above, few Xbox One owners will be affected. But affected they will be.

What exactly do I want it to say? I provided solid links to the Microsoft deal (even editing it with actual quotes). All I've asked is for proof of a moneyhat, as you suggested. You've provided nothing irrefutable, hence my continued inquisitions/posts. 

Seems to me that only one of us wants things to mesh with our beliefs, as I've made no absolute suggestions with nothing to support them.

There is no confirmation of a money hat in the link you provided. There is no confirmation of a money hat in this instance either.

However, we previously agreed (I thought) that there was a deal made in both instances. All we seem to disagree on is whether a deal for exclusivity is interchangable with the term 'moneyhat.' A pretty superfluous distinction.



starcraft - Playing Games = FUN, Talking about Games = SERIOUS