CGI-Quality said:
What exactly do I want it to say? I provided solid links to the Microsoft deal (even editing it with actual quotes). All I've asked is for proof of a moneyhat, as you suggested. You've provided nothing irrefutable, hence my continued inquisitions/posts. Seems to me that only one of us wants things to mesh with our beliefs, as I've made no absolute suggestions with nothing to support them. |
There is no confirmation of a money hat in the link you provided. There is no confirmation of a money hat in this instance either.
However, we previously agreed (I thought) that there was a deal made in both instances. All we seem to disagree on is whether a deal for exclusivity is interchangable with the term 'moneyhat.' A pretty superfluous distinction.
starcraft - Playing Games = FUN, Talking about Games = SERIOUS







