By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
CGI-Quality said:
starcraft said:

I'll be plainer.

In both cases some sort of incentive will have changed hands. In neither case do we have complete confirmation of what that incentive entails.

One will have required a greater incentivisation than the other.

Of course there was some trade of words/actions, but nothing suggests a moneyhat.

I suspect we're applying different definitions. A money hat, in my view, is any financial incentive (it need not be a direct payment) to assist in bringing about exclusivity. Examples include advertising deals, publishing deals, royalty payment discounts, extensive technical support and/or direct payments.

Some of the above have occured in both instances.



starcraft - Playing Games = FUN, Talking about Games = SERIOUS