Psychotic said:
chriscox1121 said:
Psychotic said:
chriscox1121 said:
Psychotic said:
Then it's a pretty illogical reason, isn't it?
|
Why is it illogical? It doesn't take anything away from the grand scheme of things. I added PS3 numbers as well which to repeat again, were minimal. Take them away and it still stands. What are you driving at? Please elaborate for me. It's not rocket science what I'm trying to say. Doesn't seem anyone else is having a problem with understanding my post. I only added the 360 and PS3 to give an overall view of how MS and PS were doing as a whole.
|
I'm not having problems understanding what you wanted to say, I'm saying adding PS3s and X360s into the numbers for no particular reason at all is illogical. I mean why would you? "It doesn't make a big difference anyway" is not a valid reason, it's an excuse. In fact, it might actually be a good reason NOT to include the PS3 and X360 numbers. If it doesn't make a difference, why even bother with it?
|
Well, I see we have solved the problem by assuming I "had no particular reason." Furthermore, if you look at your initial post and my subsequent posts you will see the reason for my clarification.
|
Nice try.
You LITERALLY SAID, quote: "The only reason I included it was because the sales were so minimal.", which is, as I already explained, not a valid reason. If you stole a candybar from a store that has another 1,000,000 candybars in stock, "It didn't make much difference anyway" is not the reason you stole them, it's an excuse.
|
lulz, Back at you.
If you reread what you initially posted then you will understand why I made that statement. You said "if you add the 360 and PS3." I never said "if" hence the reason for the clarification my next post on your misunderstanding. Which is why I was further clarifying in the subsequent posts.
