EA Access is a system seller.

[DonFerrari]

Jazz2K said:

DonFerrari said:

Okay I proved my point before and just secured that you approve anything MS, good... no further use for this discussion.

Lol is that the best you can do? How did you come up to that conclusion? Is it possible to end up saying you on the other hand try to disprove anything MS? Even if the service is from EA? Let me tell you something, even if the deal was exclusive to Playstation I'm sure those defending the service would still think it's decent value. But I get the feeling you would just change your tune had it been Playstation exclusive. Hope other publishers jump on this and then Sony to finaly accept just to see your reaction...

Nope since I haven't said once it is bad or good value... I said Sony justification that it isn't the value PS+ costumers are used to is valid because they offer 72 games per 50 a year and EAA offered so far 5 games for 30 a year, so it is less value in Sony opinion. And the point I proved? The guy basically approved all MS actions this gen that were bashed by basically everybody and have no hint of ever being against any MS measure, so your point? And you can say I disapprove anything MS, the thing is even tough I don't support then in the slightest you can find several posts of mine being favorable to some of their points and of course several more against them (mainly the shenanigans) and that is because I don't enter all the MS threads to cause ruckus, I go were some people are saying things spinned to favour MS in a blind manner and oppose it. Since I don't have a MS console I don't care much for what happens there besides what can make my friend and brother play better or worse so where MS fans are discussing the games they like, what is coming to the console, etc I don't bother... But were we have guys with fantastic predictions or bold claims (often false or exagerated) then I enter.

Anyway as I said I proved my point that no matter how much was discussed the guy wouldn't ever accept MS have done anything wrong (in another thread he said DRM is good, MS just didn't explained enough), and until now I haven't saw anyone that have approved the always online that wasn't a MS supporter.