yvanjean said:
Stop saying if to make a point when there is a statement saying otherwise. I remember keeping MLB '04 for the longest time because it was the only game that still had the Montreal Expos. Gamers will find value in one version of a game over another.... they could play Fifa 14 just because of one player that's not on the roster of a newer version. So there is always value to older games. I have cousins that are part of the minor league roster in the NHL '07 & '08. Sony used to not charge for their online service in order to charge customer they brought in a new service called PS+. This service was amazing giving access to full retail game for a very cheap low price of $50/year. I never owned a sony console but I know that PS+ is great value and I would love the service. Having said that now ignore PS+ and look at what you’re getting for Ea Access.... $30.year or 5$/month..... You get five retail games. Fifa 14, Madden25, Peggle 2, Battlefield 4 and Need for speed rival. If none of these game interests you and you don't want to take part of the trial. You don't buy EA Access and you haven't spent a penny **GREAT VALUE- cost you nothing**. But, If you were interested in anyone of these game how much would you have to spend at retail to buy it? Certainly more than 5$.... you can play the heck out of Need for speed rivals for a month and never give EA further money. You've gotten plenty of VALUE. If you're like me and interest in more than 3 of these games, love the 6-hour trial of games... I'm getting insane amount of value out of 29.99$ .. Heck I though the service should cost $49.99/year and still think its great value. I think I've made my case on DRM.... I love DRM ... I can't wait to get away from our reliance on Retail and the useless need for disc. I don't like reselling my game simply a waste of my time, discs are vulnerable to damage and clutter my living space, I much prefer digital. Because of gamers reliance on disc based and their ability to resell game ... console sell game digitally at a premium and I would much rather do away with disc entire and bring down the overall cost of digital games. I own the Kinect you don't... you probably haven't really spent much amount of time with it. By now we know that Microsoft is charging around 50-100$ for the Kinect (Early adopter paid $100, new bundle get a free game worth around $50) I got the Titan fall bundle..... (399.99 Xbox one, Titanfall Digital $50 and $50 Kinect) Great value..... What is the Kinect and what does it offer. As a game controller it's good enough to replace the controller but it's great for game like Just dance and fitness games other not too demanding input games. What makes it important is it comes with a camera (needed for twitch, skype, in game features), Kinect enable voice command - these features actually enhance the experience on the xbox one creating shortcut and easy navigation that is far superior to just having the controller. Kinect as seamless face recognition.... I have three xbox one profile and not once did I need to logging under my name because of the Kinect face recognition.
We all agree that the original Xbox One bundle at $499 was overpriced compare to PS4 when it first release because of the Kinect and there was a $40 mark up compared to the PS4. But now that they included a game in the bundle they have reach price parity with the PS4. What's $40 for a console that you will own for 5-6 years? |
Okay I proved my point before and just secured that you approve anything MS, good... no further use for this discussion.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."