| TruckOSaurus said: You followed last game so I'm going to make a parallel with RCT. RCT turned up with a defeated attitude when he had a lot of votes on him and a dangerously close deadline, I instantly thought his reaction was genuine and considered him Town from that point on. Even on Day Two, I was one of the rare ones sticking out for him. What made me believe him was that his situation was indeed pretty dire when he made his "I give up" speech and I could see how the situation would have looked hopeless from his point of view. Nickelsbe's situation right now is miles away from RCT's. There was only two votes on him (that's 7 votes away from a lynch), a couple of FoS and he had 4 whole real-life days of discussion ahead to remove suspicions from him through participation. So to me, this move looks fake, very very fake. |
I don't buy the vote and explanation either. Anyway, I have one general mafia related question I would like a more experienced player to answer, so right now that would be you.
My thinking is that as town, all information you expose is good, and holding back tells, reads and thoughs etc. is harmful. So, my strategy so far has been to be completely upfront about everything I see and think as long as it doesn't risk exposing town power roles. So my question is if that is a sound strategy or if it's more benificial to be more guarded even as town to keep mafia from getting too much information about how investigations are done and model their answers after that.
I'll try to let this be my only 'noob question'
