By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
yvanjean said:
DonFerrari said:
yvanjean said:

Wow can you be anymore cynical!!! Once a game join the vault it's there to stay. The vault is a storage of game that will be accessible to members of EA access. The vault will expend over the years. 

http://www.gamespot.com/articles/ea-promises-not-to-remove-games-from-ea-access-fre/1100-6421567/

UFC, PLant vs Zombie, Inquisition, NBA Live 14....all coming soon.

Yes I must be cynical... Saying that if they decided to cycle games and keep around 5 good games on the EAA it would still hold the same value... changing Fifa 14 for 15 instead of keeping booth... thanks you have really great reading skills.

And you believe EA promises because they always deliver on them and are a good company I bet... they probably promised Origins and Simcity were going to be really bad, right? Owww not, it would be good, but then it wasn't.

EA Access isn't like a blockbuster with limited storage space. Fifa 14 and 15 take up the most minimal amount of space on thier massive servers. They don't have to cycle their inventory. Once  a game goes in the vault it will be there (or at least till as long as the console lifetime). You're bashing the service for taking out games when they've already stated they would remain in the vault.  You've already claim that EA will take out value and the service give gamer fake value. 

You pay $5 --> you get access to 6 hour trial and 5 games that can be played for unlimited during your month.

I would like to personally give you $5 and you could delight us with every thing you were able to accomplish with this massive sum of money. Come on $5 doesn't get you anything and it's just foolish to claim EA Access doesn't give value. 

"We evaluated the EA Access subscription offering and decided that it does not bring the kind of value PlayStation customers have come to expect," 

If Microsoft game me the same coorporate bullsh$t statement , I would call them out on it and so should you.


Man please stop trying to spin what I said... I said that IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF they decided to cycle, but kept the same value no one would complain and the value would still be the same, because you won't need FIFA 14, 15, 16, 17 on the vault when Fifa 18 cames in (and of course EA can decide to keep all of them). What I said is that they could do that, and that they could take out value from the access (or add value there by taking value of other products putting them behind paid wall), but yes... you can keep spinning and distorting to make your point.

And again, PS+ users expect 72 games a year fo 50 bucks, so 5 games for 30 bucks isn't the value they are used to get. But yes you can keep spinning on saying sony or myself said EAA have no value instead of less value than what PS+ already give... and just in case Crysis and other EA games were on PS+ before so by having EAA besides that would mean that what before costed you 50 will now cost you 80... but yes that aint less value.

I'll wait to see you bashing MS for their bad PR and other BS... since I haven't saw you done that yet, altough with your low post count maybe I just haven't saw you in any other thread... but haven't saw you on DRM and kinect forced bundle.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."