Jazz2K said:
Locking content that users already paid for is bad pratice yes. Whoever does it should get called for.
How the hell did you come to that conclusion? I like competition a lot and especially when we get choices. EAA is another way to get games and I like it. Seems some other people like the idea too. I don't care if Square Enix, Activision and Ubisoft start doing the same really. As long as we get to have a choice in how we get our games. If you leave that to only one provider be sure they'll find all sorts of way to screw you hard. |
It would not be up to one provider. You think MS is sitting on their hands and soon wont come up with their own version. When that happens they will put sony on check and its acceptable cuz they are a platform holder and they will stay competitive. But now we have restrictions from the devs added to the restrictions from the platform holder, this is screwing us even harder, and when all of them do it,we will probably have to abandone consoles.
Look man Im not a sony fan if thats what you think. Im happy with nintendo only if in the future they are the only ones who dont restrict content like that, even if I can only play nintendo games. But when this happens, all gamers will move to PC's seing as how they are getting cheaper and more powerfull and consoles will die all together and maybe only stay nintendo for a brief period. Getting a little ahead this gen even if it cost us all the death of console gaming is going to be in the hands of the xbox fans to decide. Wich seeing by some of he coments on this forum, they rader all cosoles fail then just their loved favorite.
It takes genuine talent to see greatness in yourself despite your absence of genuine talent.