LudicrousSpeed on 04 September 2014
| d21lewis said: So now does everybody agree with me? I made a similar argument with PS3 vs 360-- whole library (exclusives, indies, multi-plat, casual, etc) vs whole library. People tried to rip me a new asshole! They said "Only exclusive hardcore games count". Now that the pendulum has swung in Sony's direction, can we all agree that it's all about what your console can play and not about what's shared with PC/ Portables/Last gen? |
It's just console wars so no, there won't be any agreeing. Last year when I was replying to thread after thread about how MS was completely ignoring the 360 with talk of games like Battleblock and State of Decay and Shogun, the posts were considered jokes because indie and downloadable games don't count. Now they apparently make or break a console.
It's all relative to what your company is focusing on.
