| CommonNinja said: But you do have to admit that there are holes in the theory. Each year the earth is getting farther and farther away from the sun. 3.6B years ago when the first lifeform suposidly formed, earth would have been much closer to the sun, and too hot to sustain any life. Likewise, earth's rotational spin is slowing down, which means that it must have been faster years ago. If you do the math back to 3.6B years ago, earth would have been spinning so rapidly that we would have day and night change within seven hours, and it would have increased the magnetic field of earth by astronomical perportions (which in turn would make earths climate much hotter, and unsustainable to life). Also, the moon is getting further away form the earth which means that 3.6 B years ago, it would have hovered mere miles above our atmosphere, and caused massive tidle waves. Of coarse scientist don't believe we have had our moon forever, but that is another discussion. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth's_rotation These are just a few example of problems with the theory, there are more that I just don't have time to add right now. |
Of course there are holes in the theory, why do you think there is research? Because we do not have a unified complete theory that can describe everything yet!
I'm not going to research into those claims, your last ones were already false, but even if those claims are true, what does it prove?
What is the point you want to show? No one claims to know the answer to every secret in the universe, that's why humans do research! How is this giving any contribution to the question whether there's a god or not?
Just stating what is clear anyway (that not everything can be explained yet) is in no way a valid hint towards some religous belief. I really don't get what you are trying to say by this.
