Soriku said:
ninjaman003 said:
You're trying to imply that science is opposed to God? Do you even know what science is? Science could very well prove the existence of God. You're only saying that you know there is a reason. What if God created it and it was simple as that? Science is knowing and proving something. If it can't be proved it is not science; therefore, there is no scientific explanation for the Big Bang. Also for the Sun example, you would have made a blind guess. One intellectual actually hypothesized this, but the SCIENTIFIC community ignored him because he had no proof.
|
What the hell are you even talking about? We have evidence for the Big Bang. Enough evidence to the point that it was elevated to scientific theory status. It's not a hypothesis.
What are you referencing in your last sentence?
|
I don't think this was supposed to go to you. It was a reply to Puppyroach. I know the Big Bang has proof. I was talking about how it was created. There is no scientific evidence of how it happened.
The last sentence he used the heliocentric model to say that if he thought this a thousand years ago, he would be right. I was just saying that it would have been a lucky guess.