By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
wilco said:
Hoodieninja said:

1. I'm also Tired of Horror Movie Tropes. So what if Developers recycle these tropes so much, it's part of the Entertainment Buisness. Men don't get all uppity when it comes to typical Male Tropes. The movie industry Exploits Male Behaviour all the time.

2. So just because something is a Backround Decoration does it make Woman less Signifigant? Does it make America less signifigant even though the Lincoln movie is about America?

3.  She's the definition of a Femi-Nazi. She misrepresents data and facts.

4. Story's that Exploit woman. She obviously doesn't care as much about how Woman are treated in the workplace. She cares more about Tropes in movies.


1. If you enjoy your tropes in movies and games that is fine. Why is someone talking about them such a crime? How is the fact that men don't get all "uppity" relevant to what Sarkeesian is doing? So if men don't discuss male tropes she isn't allowed to discuss female tropes?

2. In the media where that thing is the background decoration, yes that thing is less significant. Your second sentence doesn't even make sense so I'm not sure how to address it.

3. Its funny that the people that use words like "femi-nazi" tend to be people that act more like nazi's than anything. Do yourself a favor and lay off the Limbaugh for a while.

4. So it is irrational to hate stories that exploit women? And please don't start the whole "She should talk about Y because Y is more important than X" nonsense. She chose a topic, she is discussing that topic. Argue her points on the topic at hand instead of trying to move the goal post.

1. She is, Did I ever say she shouldn't? There's a whole difference between doing so and Misrepresenting Facts.

2. How does it make Women Less signifigant when they're used as Important to portray something that is wrong?

3. Femi-Nazi is a term used waaay before Limbaugh. So how am I acting like a Nazi? http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=feminazi

4. No there is nothing wrong with that. She just misrepresent facts, and she's completely Biased. She's creating controversy out of something that doesn't matter.

She's as Relevant as Rush Limbaugh. That's how she makes money and it's sad. Her soul purpose is to make a Rise out of people that is a Subject that is as much of a problem as Violence in movies and Video Games.

Did I at all say she doesn't have the right to be an Idiot? Man that'll be amazing Rush Limbaugh taken off the air because clearly he's an idiot that misrepresents data and evidence and spins it just like Sarkeesian does.