wilco said:
2. In the media where that thing is the background decoration, yes that thing is less significant. Your second sentence doesn't even make sense so I'm not sure how to address it. 3. Its funny that the people that use words like "femi-nazi" tend to be people that act more like nazi's than anything. Do yourself a favor and lay off the Limbaugh for a while. 4. So it is irrational to hate stories that exploit women? And please don't start the whole "She should talk about Y because Y is more important than X" nonsense. She chose a topic, she is discussing that topic. Argue her points on the topic at hand instead of trying to move the goal post. |
1. She is, Did I ever say she shouldn't? There's a whole difference between doing so and Misrepresenting Facts.
2. How does it make Women Less signifigant when they're used as Important to portray something that is wrong?
3. Femi-Nazi is a term used waaay before Limbaugh. So how am I acting like a Nazi? http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=feminazi
4. No there is nothing wrong with that. She just misrepresent facts, and she's completely Biased. She's creating controversy out of something that doesn't matter.
She's as Relevant as Rush Limbaugh. That's how she makes money and it's sad. Her soul purpose is to make a Rise out of people that is a Subject that is as much of a problem as Violence in movies and Video Games.
Did I at all say she doesn't have the right to be an Idiot? Man that'll be amazing Rush Limbaugh taken off the air because clearly he's an idiot that misrepresents data and evidence and spins it just like Sarkeesian does.







