By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Hoodieninja said:

1. Challenging the Status Quo LOL. Claiming that these movies have a responsibility for teaching you something in the first place. Her Crticisms are nothing but a Soccer Mom's critcism of rated R movies. So what? Challenging the Status Quo to prove that Exploitive Material is Sexist? What a joke.

2. No, fallacy. They aren't just props in a side story, they are there to portray that this is how they are being used. They aren't just backround decorations.

3. clearly you don't.

4. Irrational Hatred? how so? If anything has an Irrational Hatred torward anything it's Anita.

1. You challenge the status quo by getting rid of tired tropes that have been so overused they border on parody. I don't understand why anyone would be against this. Even if Sarkeesians videos don't enlighten you on issues of sexism at the very least they show that developers recycle these tropes far too much. If you think her criticisms are just a soccor mom's criticism of rated r movies then you are either not paying attention and are simply parroting what you hear from other people or you don't actually understand the criticisms. 

2. That was the whole point of the background decoration video. Developers add these npc's to give their game a more gritty feel, in this case the seedy underground sex industry. They serve the same purpose that graffiti on a wall does in a video game. It helps set the tone. I don't have any problem with that personally, it can be an effective way of visual storytelling but they are still just background decoration.

3. I'm not the one stating that Anita Sarkeesian is a "femi-nazi" as fact. 

4. What does Anita Sarkeesian hate? Or more acurrately what do you assume that she hates?