wilco said:
Hoodieninja said:
1. When Sin City was popular it wasn't Satire it's purpose was to Exploitive. You're right those games are being Exploitive So what?
Do you complain about Violence in video games or movies? They're still being Self Conscious it's not an excuse, it's true.
What Responsibility is this? These Movies and Video Games don't have any Responsibilities when Teaching you anything.
2. She Claims the Girls in Watchdogs are just being used as Backrounds when the hero is clearly trying to take down the underground industry. The girls are clearly more than just backrounds they are part of a story. One of the many misrepresentations Anita does.
3. That she misrepresents Evidence and that is a fact, that she overexaggerates everything she says, the fact that she is a Femi-Nazi and that she seeks attention through Trolls.
4. Fear? absolutely not, all she tapped into is how stupidly annoying she is and this is why people hate her. LOL Men afraid of Anita what a joke.
|
1. I am of the opinion that creators should not be limited. If they want to be sexist, racist, etc, I say go for it. But lets call a spade a spade. They shouldn't be immune to criticism. I know you don't want to believe it but the images and messages people see absolutely do have an affect. It may not affect you and me in an obvious way but to say that it has no affect is being naive. The responsiblity media has is to whether or not they want to support the status quo or challenge it. They can choose to go either way and you can enjoy it either way but don't kid yourself into thinking that just because it is entertainment it is meaningless. I wish that was the case but its not, we get bombarded by information every day and it can all start to add up.
2. Saying the npc strippers in watchdogs are "part of the story" because the hero is trying to take down the underground industry does not elevate them beyond background status. It is accurate to say that they are background decoration because most of them are. Sure you may be able to see their algorithmically defined profile like you can for every citizen in that game but they are still just props in a side story.
3. I'm not sure you understand the difference between facts and opinions.
4. Your irrational hatred of her is really fascinating. I really am curious to know where it comes from.
|
1. Challenging the Status Quo LOL. Claiming that these movies have a responsibility for teaching you something in the first place. Her Crticisms are nothing but a Soccer Mom's critcism of rated R movies. So what? Challenging the Status Quo to prove that Exploitive Material is Sexist? What a joke.
Of course movies and tv shows have an affect on people. That is why we have RATINGS, and these shown time and time again that Violence in video games doesn't mean you'll do so in real life. It's a Fantasy.
2. No, fallacy. They aren't just props in a side story, they are there to portray that this is how they are being used. They aren't just backround decorations.
3. clearly you don't.
4. Irrational Hatred? how so? If anything has an Irrational Hatred torward anything it's Anita.
Guess what? most men are feminists. If anything I agree with a lot of what Feminists have to say.
Women should be treated equally in the workplace etc...
Women should have equal rights to men
hell I even voted for Hillary.
