| CGI-Quality said: Why should I assume it didn't do well? You made a claim that it "only sold well because of a lack of titles on the system". I guess that you have data and info that I don't, but I'm glad we agree that the layoff talk was meaningless. In short, you the made claims, here. Me, I recall the devs, themselves, talking about a sequel. I mean, I highly doubt we have just received a standalone DLC for an unsuccessful game. |
That really doesnt mean anything. Castlevania Lords of shadow 2 had DLC and wasnt sucessful. Theres plenty of examples i'm sure.
Infamous 2nd son was a next-gen title that had very atractive graphics. I can only assume that for it to break even without DLC it would have to sell 2 or 3 millions. Since it didnt hit those numbers, i question if it was sucessful enough to warrant a sequal.
Though its quite possible that Sony was willing to take losses on it to sell PS4's, Shu has admited that they dont make a profit on most titles. Anyways its my opinion, i can tell that this back and forth wont lead anywhere. :)
