The following is my attempt at a profile, at least as best as I could do without referring directly to the thread when I was in class. I separated my notes into pros, cons, neutral (could be taken either way), and personal feelings. That last section is because I know I tend to let my feelings color my judgements.
Padib:
Pros:
-proven to be a governor, usually a town role
-makes unique contributions to discussions
Neutral:
-was honest about his role, cooperated in the end to test it
-initially was against testing so that he could reuse his role
Cons:
-governors can be mafia
-mafia governors tend to appear in games with other ways for town to kill besides a lynch
-Source for that^: http://wiki.mafiascum.net/index.php?title=Governor
-there are multiple town roles that can kill (two vigs, potentially a bomb?)
Personal feelings:
-seems sincere (perhaps to a fault)
-seems to agree with me or think like me frequently
-has voiced disapproval of prof at times when I was fed up with prof, which I couldn't help but like
-has been really nice, at least to me and other noobs
Verdict: You know, laying it out like this makes me realize my belief in him being town isn’t as solid as I thought. Prof’s placing him as “somewhat town” actually seems right. Perhaps it’s my personal feelings talking, but I still lean town with him.
60% town
