Dadrik said:
Jranation said:
Dadrik said:
vivster said:
Dadrik said:
Maybe because last gen systems aren't only 3 years old and it was well known they were getting close to the end of the gen cycle ?
|
So what? Is there a secret rule of how long a company has to wait before they can release new hardware?
Again, the only negative thing about this I see is a money concern. But that is the case for any entertainment.
|
I seriously can't believe what I'm reading here.
People are pissed about DLCs, microtransactions, etc... But this is fine !
Is there a secret rule about what can be considered a "full" game and what can be an DLC ? No, absolutely not.
It's only about respect toward the consumers.
|
You dont get it.
We cant have the new games, without making a better cpu.
|
And it seems you didn't read my previous posts. This is not a great excuse at all. It it was an actually old console, yeah, sure. But it's way too early, or the 3DS was released way too late.
Hardwares get outdated FAST. Releasing a new console with a more powerful CPU whenever devs feel like they have projects too demanding for the current hardware is NOT a solution. Or they could just go ahead and release a new slightly more powerful console each year, or each 2 years.
|
The poing in here is the games. Look at ps vita, it is so powerful, but hardly any devs supports it.
But for nintendo. If you lool at the beat selling games on 3ds, nearly all of them are first party, or from/published by nintendo. This means that, nintendo has FULL CONTROL on what games they will/can put.
The third party is hardly helping nintendo (both 3ds and wii u). So they dont need to wait for any
